As Alisdair ManIntyre argues
in regard to timeless principle - there are no timeless principles.
in regard to timeless principle - there are no timeless principles.
For locating a
principle outside time or history, and using it to judge present reality is an ahistorical nonsense.
For the
contemporary American Left, the principle appears as a theory of multicultural
tolerance and shared instruction that presumes a vantage point,, we can never get outside language and stand on some observing pinnacle of righteousness - from which one
can determine how well or badly one is behaving/doing the 'right' things. For the 'right' thing is immersed in history.
The liberal’s principle is
transparent. Stanley Fish argues that belief in any of these three vantage
points is illogical and ahistorical.
For him, the two amount to the same thing.
A ‘principle’ implies a point of view outside oneself – an impossibility.
Logically, one can never be apart from oneself; a community can never be apart
from itself; history can never get outside itself.- ergo, a sinister
uniformity lurks within multiculturalist tolerance,
So what to do about our supposed principles? - violate the notion of principles by having no principles
as essentially they are a nonsense
So what to do about our supposed principles? - violate the notion of principles by having no principles
as essentially they are a nonsense
No comments:
Post a Comment